Article summary
This paper develops a dynamic discrete choice framework for multiple attitudes to identify which attitudes are most influential within an attitude system and to distinguish sources of stability and instability. The model accommodates ordinal attitudinal measures, time-varying gaps between interviews, and a multiple-factor structure to capture time-invariant individual traits. The authors apply the approach to five core political attitudes and to issue attitudes about government spending and immigration, preserving qualifications about the roles of permanent heterogeneity and transitory shocks.