Article summary
Introduction: You've seen it countless times—candidates make promises during elections, but not all follow through. This article explores why some parties are more reliable than others when keeping their election commitments.
Introduction: You've seen it countless times—candidates make promises during elections, but not all follow through. This article explores why some parties are more reliable than others when keeping their election commitments.
Implications for Research and Policy**\n\nThe findings suggest that while logistical constraints create a subtle but significant disadvantage in remote regions, they don't fundamentally alter the outcomes of Colombia's electoral system. This nuance helps refine theories about party competition.​₹ \nThe research provides practical insights regarding resource allocation by political parties seeking to maximize territorial influence across different campaign periods and geographical contexts within Colombia.​​
Political systems' organizational structures significantly influence the degree of governmental centralization or decentralization.
This article presents a newly assembled dataset documenting electoral alliances (coligações) formed to contest Brazilian general elections from 1986 to 2014. The collection records alliances across both gubernatorial and national lower-house contests, allowing direct comparison of coordination across offices.
Lijphart's consensus–majoritarian typology is widely used but has rarely been applied to Latin America. This study adapts that framework for the region by treating the type of democracy as an independent variable and adding informal factors—such as clientelism and informal employment—into the assessment of democratic patterns.