FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Why Good Services Mean Fewer Votes For Incumbents?

southern africaservice deliveryvoter accountabilitydominant partiesAfrican Politics@BJPS4 R files5 datasetsDataverse
African Politics subfield banner

Citizens expect government accountability through voting when service delivery improves.

In Southern African democracies, however, a surprising negative relationship exists: better services predict lower support for dominant party incumbents.

This finding holds across regions and local governance types, suggesting voter concerns about corruption or increasing expectations drive the response. Survey data indicate citizens' attitudes are influenced by these factors as service quality rises.

Key Findings:

  • Incumbent support decreases with better services
  • This effect occurs regardless of local government control
  • Citizens may demand accountability even when governments deliver well, potentially due to corruption concerns or ratcheting preferences (gradually increasing expectations)

Real-World Relevance:

This nuanced understanding challenges simplistic views on democratic accountability in developing nations and highlights the complex interplay between service provision perception and electoral behavior.

Article card for article: Nuanced Accountability: Voter Responses to Service Delivery in Southern Africa
Nuanced Accountability: Voter Responses to Service Delivery in Southern Africa was authored by Daniel de Kadt and Evan Lieberman. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker