FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Does Longer Political Tenure Reduce Violence? Uncertainty over Corruption Explains Mexico's Homicide Trends
Insights from the Field
political corruption
electoral outcomes
institutional uncertainty
homicide rates
Law Courts Justice
BJPS
1 datasets
Dataverse
Getting a Hand By Cutting Them Off: How Uncertainty over Political Corruption Affects Violence was authored by Paul Zachary and William Spaniel. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2020.

Politicians can constrain criminal violence by setting police enforcement levels, but cartels can exploit this by bribing officials. Cartels only escalate their use of violence after successfully bribing political leaders, suggesting that local violence spikes with increased political tenure post-election due to uncertainty about corruption.

Research Context

Following elections in Mexico, where politicians influence police enforcement but face bribery risks from cartels, the balance shifts. Cartel uncertainty about corruptibility means not every bribe succeeds.

Key Findings

Analysis of homicide and political tenure data reveals a clear link: homicides increase significantly after each election as parties gain longer tenures without successful bribes being detected or implemented initially.

The study finds that Mexico experiences roughly 950 additional homicides annually for every year increased political tenure occurs post-election. This pattern suggests that the process of learning about corrupt politicians and adjusting enforcement creates a temporary spike in violence.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan