This article challenges the conventional view that ruling parties are strong institutions within authoritarian regimes.

Contrary to common assumptions, most parties collapse upon leadership transitions. The study analyzes data from global dictatorships (1946–2008) and concludes that even single-party regimes often feature weak party structures unable to function effectively without their founding figure.

This finding suggests ruling parties may be less essential than previously thought for maintaining autocratic power.

Using a dataset of authoritarian regimes from 1946-2008, the author demonstrates how most ruling parties fail to survive after the death or departure of their original founder.

* Time Period: 1946–2008

* Geographic Scope: Global dictatorships

A key finding shows that even many single-party regimes feature relatively weak party structures incapable of ensuring regime continuity without strong leadership. The study argues that ruling parties' structural fragility may help explain the frequent transitions within authoritarian systems.

This research reframes our understanding of how institutional strength functions in autocratic contexts.