FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Communication Gaps Shape Accountability: How Citizen Perceptions Matter

Citizen PerceptionsSurvey ExperimentLegislative CommunicationUS PoliticsPolitical BehaviorBJPS3 R files3 datasetsDataverse
Subfield banner image

Does the responsiveness of elected officials to constituent communication correlate with their descriptive representation? This study investigates citizen evaluations of legislator-constituent interactions. We conducted a survey experiment using data collected from citizens across multiple US states, testing reactions to different forms of official outreach—whether through town halls or digital correspondence—and how these perceptions influence support for policy responsiveness and overall accountability assessments.

Key Findings:

* Citizens significantly evaluate their representatives' communication practices.

* Responsive interactions enhance approval ratings regardless of partisan alignment.

* Digital contact does not inherently substitute for in-person engagement.

Real-World Significance:

These findings demonstrate that seemingly minor variations in how officials communicate can substantially shape accountability mechanisms and descriptive representation outcomes.

Article Card
Citizen Evaluations of Legislator-Constituent Communication was authored by Mia Costa. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker