FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Does Your Interaction Effect Really Need a Product Term? New Evidence on Logistic Regression

product termLogistic Regressioninteraction testingconditional effectsMethodology@PSR&MDataverse
Methodology subfield banner

This paper argues that political scientists incorrectly theorize interaction effects due to variable compression alone, leading to biased results if product terms aren't included in logistic regression models. While simulation studies show models with product terms fit non-interactive relationships surprisingly well, removing the bias toward finding spurious interactions is possible by including this term.

Article card for article: Compression and Conditional Effects: A Product Term Is Essential When Using Logistic Regression to Test for Interaction
Compression and Conditional Effects: A Product Term Is Essential When Using Logistic Regression to Test for Interaction was authored by Carlisle Rainey. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2016.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Edit article record marker