FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Interview Mode Shifts Responses: Self-Completing vs Face-to-Face for Cognitively Diverse Audiences

item non-responseself-complete surveysin-person interviewscognitive skillsU.S.randomized experimentresponse variationMethodology@PSR&M5 Stata files5 datasetsDataverse
Methodology subfield banner

Technology has enabled new modes of survey interviews, but their responses may differ due to interviewers. This paper finds that self-complete surveys reduce item non-response compared to face-to-face interviews across topics and question formats.

Data & Methods:

We conducted a field experiment randomly assigning adults in the U.S. to complete surveys either in-person or independently.

Key Findings:

• Item non-response was consistently lower in self-complete mode

• This difference worsened for individuals with lower cognitive skills

• A respondent with average abilities could be up to six times more likely to respond 'don't know' during face-to-face interviews than self-completed surveys, depending on question type.

Why It Matters:

These findings highlight the importance of accounting for interview mode when designing political science research and interpreting survey results.

Article card for article: How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill affect Item Non-response: A randomized experiment assigning mode of interview
How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill affect Item Non-response: A randomized experiment assigning mode of interview was authored by Lynn Vavreck and Andrew Gooch. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Edit article record marker