FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Adding Covariates Can Worsen Bias in Political Studies?

Omitted Variables BiasUnobserved ConfoundersCountervailing EffectsOveradjustmentMethodology@PSR&M2 R files1 datasetDataverse
Methodology subfield banner

Problem:

Conditioning on covariates is standard practice in political research, but scholars often overlook a critical issue: unobserved variables and their interactions with observed ones.

Key Insight:

This paper demonstrates that when two confounding factors act in opposition (one strengthens the bias while the other reduces it), adding an extra variable can actually increase bias in your results. This seemingly counterintuitive finding occurs even when standard balance tests suggest improvement.

Implications & Findings:

• We show this phenomenon isn't rare, appearing frequently in real political data sets

• Common approaches like balance testing and sensitivity analysis do NOT protect against this potential overadjustment bias

• Researchers need to reconsider their variable inclusion strategies more carefully

This research highlights a crucial nuance about omitted variables that challenges conventional wisdom.

Article card for article: Omitted Variables, Countervailing Effects, and The Possibility of Overadjustment
Omitted Variables, Countervailing Effects, and The Possibility of Overadjustment was authored by Kevin Clarke, Brenton Kenkel and Miguel Rueda. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2018.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Edit article record marker