FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Globalization Doesn't Boost Welfare Views? New Evidence Upends Conventional Wisdom

Swedencompensation hypothesishierarchical modelingactive labor programsPolitical Behavior@PSR&MDataverse
Political Behavior subfield banner

This paper addresses a gap in the literature on globalization's effects on welfare spending. Previous studies focused exclusively on either macro-level impacts or micro-level individual reactions.

Drawing from hierarchical modeling, we analyze individual citizens' responses alongside country-specific characteristics and actual global economic changes.

Our key findings reveal two important trends:

  • Individual attitudes toward globalization are context-dependent (various based on whether they're winners or losers)
  • When welfare generosity is measured through government spending on active labor market programs, more positive attitudes emerge among citizens

These results challenge the compensation hypothesis. However, our analysis suggests that individuals' views might be shaped differently depending on how we measure welfare state generosity.

This nuanced understanding helps explain why some studies find different effects than others.

Article card for article: Adding Another Level: Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies
Adding Another Level: Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies was authored by Lena Schaffer and Gabriele Spilker. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2016.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods