FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Binary Outcomes Aren't Independent—But How Do We Account for That?

Civil Warspatiotemporal interdependencebinary outcomes probitmaximum simulated likelihoodMethodology@PSR&M4 Stata filesDataverse
Methodology subfield banner

Spatial/spatiotemporal interdependence matters in binary outcomes like civil war, but estimating it is hard. This paper explains the challenges and introduces a new method: maximum simulated likelihood via recursive importance sampling. It compares this approach to naive estimation strategies and shows how to calculate spatial effects on probabilities of outcomes.

New Method: Maximum Simulated Likelihood with Recursive Importance Sampling

  • Addresses complex interdependence structures directly
  • Provides consistent, asymptotically efficient estimates
  • Overcomes limitations of traditional approaches

Civil War Application in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Demonstrates practical relevance for spatial econometrics
  • Illustrates effects on conflict probabilities
  • Shows how to interpret substantive implications from models
Article card for article: Spatial- and Spatiotemporal-Autoregressive Probit Models of Interdependent Binary Outcomes
Spatial- and Spatiotemporal-Autoregressive Probit Models of Interdependent Binary Outcomes was authored by Robert Franzese, Jude Hays and Scott Cook. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2016.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods