FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Binary Outcomes Aren't Independent—But How Do We Account for That?

spatiotemporal interdependencebinary outcomes probitmaximum simulated likelihoodCivil WarMethodology@PSR&M4 Stata filesDataverse
Methodology subfield banner

Spatial/spatiotemporal interdependence matters in binary outcomes like civil war, but estimating it is hard. This paper explains the challenges and introduces a new method: maximum simulated likelihood via recursive importance sampling. It compares this approach to naive estimation strategies and shows how to calculate spatial effects on probabilities of outcomes.

New Method: Maximum Simulated Likelihood with Recursive Importance Sampling

  • Addresses complex interdependence structures directly
  • Provides consistent, asymptotically efficient estimates
  • Overcomes limitations of traditional approaches

Civil War Application in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Demonstrates practical relevance for spatial econometrics
  • Illustrates effects on conflict probabilities
  • Shows how to interpret substantive implications from models
Article card for article: Spatial- and Spatiotemporal-Autoregressive Probit Models of Interdependent Binary Outcomes
Spatial- and Spatiotemporal-Autoregressive Probit Models of Interdependent Binary Outcomes was authored by Robert Franzese, Jude Hays and Scott Cook. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2016.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Edit article record marker