FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Elite Preference in China's Candidate Selection Ignores Loyalty & Competence: A 20 Pct Surcharge
Insights from the Field
Conjoint Experimentation
Political Kinship
China Government
Elite Agency Problem
Asian Politics
PSR&M
1 R files
2 Stata files
3 text files
1 datasets
Dataverse
The Logic of Authoritarian Political Selection: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment in China was authored by Hanzhang Liu. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2019.

How do authoritarian elites select political candidates? Using a conjoint experiment with over 300 Chinese officials, this study investigates entry-level selection logic.

Conjoint Experiment Design: Surveying >300 Chinese government officials to understand their candidate preferences.

The analysis reveals that while elites nominally follow institutional norms favoring competence and loyalty, they actually prioritize political kinship ties significantly more. Candidates connected through kinship with the government have a 20+ percentage point higher chance of selection regardless of demonstrated competence or loyalty.

Why It Matters: This finding suggests an agency problem in Chinese authoritarian politics. Elite preferences for nepotism appear inconsistent with long-term regime survival goals, potentially undermining governance effectiveness over time.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Podcast host Ryan