FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Door-Knocking Yields Smaller Boost in UK Voter Turnout Than Leaflets Alone

GOTV ExperimentLeaflet EffectUK Voter TurnoutVoting and Elections@PSR&M2 Stata filesDataverse
Voting and Elections subfield banner

Campaigning personalization is often thought necessary for voter mobilization, but this gap between theory and practice may not always hold. This study examines a 2017 field experiment conducted with the Liberal Democrats in the United Kingdom.

Key Findings:

* Postal party leaflets boosted turnout by 4.3 percentage points, while canvass visits added just 0.6 percentage points.

* Leaflet effectiveness slightly outweighed personal contact, contradicting expectations that direct interaction is essential for GOTV success.

Real-World Relevance:

This work addresses calls for more European-based GOTV experiments by demonstrating the surprising influence of impersonal communication in the UK context. Furthermore, it stands as a unique field experiment comparing GOTV tactics at the individual level outside the United States.

The study design carefully compares these methods.

Article card for article: Is It Worth Door-Knocking? Evidence from a UK-based GOTV Field Experiment on the Effect of Party Leaflets and Canvass Visits on Voter Turnout
Is It Worth Door-Knocking? Evidence from a UK-based GOTV Field Experiment on the Effect of Party Leaflets and Canvass Visits on Voter Turnout was authored by Joshua Townsley. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2018.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods