🕯️ Question and Core Argument

This study asks whether local wartime experiences shape political behavior for people who did not directly live through the events. The argument is that intense local armed resistance leaves enduring political legacies that “memory entrepreneurs” convert into present-day political action through a community-based, intergenerational transmission process built on three activities: memorialization, localization, and mobilization.

🔎 Evidence: Municipal Data Paired With a Close Local Case

• Statistical analysis of original data compiled across Italian municipalities covering the legacy of the 1940s armed resistance against Nazi-Fascist forces.
• Within-case analysis of a purposively selected locality to trace how collective memory is preserved and activated at the community level.
• Combination of cross-municipal quantitative evidence and detailed qualitative process-tracing provides both breadth and causal-mechanism insight.

📌 Key Findings

• Local experiences of armed resistance create political legacies that persist beyond the lifetimes of direct participants.
• “Memory entrepreneurs” translate past resistance into contemporary action by:
• Memorialization (creating and sustaining commemorations and symbols),
• Localization (rooting memory in specific places and municipal institutions), and
• Mobilization (turning preserved memory into social and political engagement).
• These legacies shape political behavior in ways that extend beyond electoral competition and party alignments, affecting broader forms of civic and political action.

💡 Why It Matters

This study clarifies the mechanisms of long-term transmission of wartime political influence, highlights armed resistance as a critical source of durable political legacies, and demonstrates how collective memory can be preserved and activated at the local level to influence contemporary politics beyond traditional electoral arenas.