🔎 What the study asks

This study asks how voters respond to rising house prices and argues that those responses depend on national economic institutions. In countries with liberal welfare and credit regimes (the United Kingdom), house-price growth is predicted to be seen as a positive sign and to generate little demand for price-restraint policies. In countries with generous welfare and restrictive credit regimes (Germany), house-price appreciation is predicted to be viewed more skeptically and to generate greater demand for policies that restrain prices.

🧪 How reactions were measured

• A custom survey with an embedded experimental treatment tested respondents’ perceptions of house-price growth.
• Respondent groups included homeowners and renters in the United Kingdom and Germany.

📊 Key findings

• British homeowners experimentally regarded house-price growth as a sign of economic health.
• German homeowners did not view price growth as a positive signal, and renters in both countries likewise refrained from viewing it as economic good news.
• German voters—both homeowners and renters—expressed stronger support for policies that would restrain house prices than their British counterparts.

🔍 Why it matters

These results show that similar types of voters (e.g., homeowners) hold different attitudes about housing depending on institutional context. Differences in welfare and credit regimes help explain cross-national variation in whether rising house prices are celebrated or seen as cause for policy intervention, with implications for comparative studies of housing politics and for policymakers seeking to anticipate public support for housing regulation.