Opening Question:
What explains contemporary Africans' attachment to the nation? This analysis links long-run socialization by precolonial rulers and the form of colonial administration to present-day patterns of national versus ethnic identification.
📚 Historical Statehood Meets Contemporary Surveys:
Historical measures of early African statehood are paired with continent-wide survey responses that record respondents' national and ethnic identifications.
- Data: historical indicators of precolonial state institutions and ruler socialization
- Evidence: survey responses from across African countries measuring national versus ethnic attachment
🔎 Key Patterns Found:
- National identification is jointly shaped by two forces: the extent to which precolonial rulers socialized subjects into a common identity, and whether colonial administrators ruled directly or through ethnic intermediaries.
- Where precolonial rulers had socialized a shared identity but colonial governments governed through ethnic intermediaries (indirect or indirect-like rule), ethnic allegiance often still outweighs national identity. This occurs because ethnic institutions continue to mediate how local communities relate to the state.
- In contrast, where colonial policies of direct rule displaced precolonial rulers and formerly centralized groups lost political autonomy, the legacy of early statehood commonly produced the opposite result: greater interethnic cohesion and stronger national identification.
💡 Why It Matters:
These findings shift attention away from explanations that focus solely on (post)colonial experiences by showing that precolonial socialization and the specific mode of colonial rule together shape contemporary African nationalism. Understanding this interaction clarifies when ethnic institutions persist as primary political brokers and when early state legacies promote cross-ethnic cohesion.
