
🧭 The Puzzle: Tax Power Separated from Spending
Medieval European monarchies typically separated the power to tax from the power to spend. That institutional separation produced persistent fiscal gridlock. A political scope condition is introduced: war motivates fiscal expansion only when this separation creates a binding constraint that can be removed.
💣 Why 1500 Mattered: Money and the Military Revolution
The military revolution after 1500 raised the importance of money for battlefield success. As external war pressures increased, the fiscal gridlock generated by separate taxing and spending authorities became increasingly intolerable, creating strong incentives for institutional reform.
📊 How Reforms Were Tracked
🔍 Key Findings
⚖️ Why It Matters
These results refine the classic argument that war drives state fiscal capacity. The effect of war depends on preexisting political institutions—specifically, whether taxing and spending powers are separated. Where separation produced gridlock, war pushed states toward new stable institutional equilibria (absolute or parliamentary fiscal regimes); where absolutism already prevailed, war did not trigger the same reforms. This provides a conditional causal account of how military pressures shaped divergent European state-formation pathways.

| Warfare, Fiscal Gridlock, and State Formation During Europe's Military Revolution was authored by Gary W. Cox, Mark Dincecco and Massimiliano Gaetano Onorato. It was published by Chicago in JOP in 2025. |