FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Screeners Could Enhance Political Science Data Quality

screeners for attentionitem-response theorysurvey standardizationMethodology@PSR&M3 R files1 Stata file1 datasetDataverse
Methodology subfield banner

### Improving Survey Reliability

New research provides guidance on effectively using screener questions to identify inattentive respondents during self-administered surveys—a common problem that introduces noise into datasets.

### Key Findings from Item-Response Theory

Using just four carefully selected screeners—specifically two grid and two multiple choice questions—can successfully pinpoint un attentive participants.

This approach helps reduce noisy responses, making correlations stronger between survey items. As a result, political science researchers can avoid null findings caused by inattentive answering.

### Practical Application

Our results enable the standardization of screener implementation across future surveys—a crucial step for improving data quality and reliability.

Article card for article: Using Screeners to Measure Respondent Attention on Self-Administered Surveys: Which Items and How Many?
Using Screeners to Measure Respondent Attention on Self-Administered Surveys: Which Items and How Many? was authored by Christopher Warshaw, Adam J. Berinsky, Michele F. Margolis and Michael W. Sances. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods