FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Crisis Signaling Games: Why Multiple Equilibria Create Messy Data Predictions

Sanctionssignaling gamesmultiple equilibriaaudience costsInternational Relations@PSR&M23 R files7 datasetsDataverse
International Relations subfield banner

Signaling games help explain political crises, but they often have multiple possible outcomes. This creates a problem for using theory with data.

The Problem:

Multiple equilibria make likelihood calculations unclear and discontinuous even if the game itself has one clear outcome.

Our Experiments Show:

Current estimation methods fail to find correct parameters in crisis-signaling games, despite large samples or unique equilibria.

Proposed Solutions: Three New Estimators

These new approaches overcome these limitations and perform better than existing ones. We tested them on data about economic sanctions.

Crucial Findings: Our analysis reveals a previously unnoticed U-shaped relationship between audience costs and leaders' willingness to threaten sanctions, showing the complex reality that simpler models miss.

Article card for article: Estimating Crisis Signaling Games with Multiple Equilibria: Problems and Solutions
Estimating Crisis Signaling Games with Multiple Equilibria: Problems and Solutions was authored by Casey Crisman-Cox and Michael Gibilisco. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods