🔍 What Was Examined

This paper examines how the timing of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) disbursements affects crime, focusing on grocery-store crime and theft. Two policy-driven sources of variation identify how spreading out benefit receipt changes short-term criminal activity.

📊 How Timing Differences Were Leveraged

• An Illinois policy change that substantially increased the number of SNAP distribution days across the month.
• An existing Indiana policy that issues SNAP benefits according to recipients' last names, producing staggered receipt throughout the benefit cycle.

📈 Key Findings

• Staggering SNAP benefits leads to large reductions in grocery-store crime: overall crime falls by 17.5% and theft by 20.9%.
• Temporal dynamics within the benefit cycle are pronounced: theft decreases in the second and third weeks after benefit receipt but rises in the final week of the cycle, consistent with households facing resource constraints as benefits are depleted.

⚖️ Why It Matters

These results show that when benefits are distributed matters for short-term crime risk. Spreading disbursements across more days reduces theft and overall grocery-store crime without changing benefit amounts, highlighting a practical policy lever that affects public safety and household behavior.