FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Strict Voter ID Laws Amplify Partisan Confidence Divides

PartisanshipPolitical PolarizationUS StatesElectoral ReformVoter Identification Laws2014 US StatesVoting and Elections@SPPQDataverse
Voting and Elections subfield banner

Our model explains public reactions to politicized electoral reforms, focusing on rival partisan elites' signals.

In states adopting voter identification laws, confidence in elections was found polarized by party alignment. Democrats in strict-ID states showed declining confidence; Republicans expressed increased confidence.

This polarization indicates that strict photo ID requirements are failing to foster broad-based trust and may be eroding confidence among some voters.

🔍 Data & Methods: Applied survey data from 2014, analyzing partisan responses across US states.

📊 Key Finding: The effect of voter ID laws on election confidence is not uniform but strongly tied to party identification.

💡 Why It Matters: These reforms may exacerbate political divides rather than enhance electoral legitimacy.

Article card for article: A Partisan Model of Electoral Reform: Voter Identification Laws and Confidence in State Elections
A Partisan Model of Electoral Reform: Voter Identification Laws and Confidence in State Elections was authored by Todd Donovan and Shaun Bowler. It was published by Sage in SPPQ in 2016.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Sage Journals
State Politics & Policy Quarterly