FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

How Much Is the Prior Driving Rare-Event Logistic Results?

separationLogistic RegressionJeffreys priorpartial priorrare eventsMethodology@Pol. An.Dataverse
Methodology subfield banner

🔍 The Challenge

When samples are small or events are rare, explanatory variables can perfectly predict outcomes (separation) in binary models. In those situations, maximum likelihood estimation gives implausible or undefined estimates, and researchers often turn to priors to stabilize inference.

🧭 Common Fix and Its Limits

Jeffreys’ invariant prior is widely used because it is automatic and stabilizes estimates. However, Jeffreys’ prior can inject more information than intended: it frequently produces smaller point estimates and narrower confidence intervals than even highly skeptical priors.

🛠️ A New Diagnostic: Partial Prior Distribution

To help assess how much information a prior contributes, the concept of a partial prior distribution is introduced. This concept and accompanying tools make it possible to:

  • Compute the partial prior distribution of quantities of interest
  • Re-estimate the logistic model with that partial prior in place
  • Summarize how much the prior shifts estimates and uncertainty

📌 Why It Matters

The partial prior distribution gives a practical way to measure and communicate the amount of prior information injected into separated logistic regressions. This allows researchers to judge whether an "automatic" prior like Jeffreys’ is overly informative for a given application and to compare its influence with more skeptical priors.

Article card for article: Dealing With Separation in Logistic Regression Models
Dealing With Separation in Logistic Regression Models was authored by Carlisle Rainey. It was published by Cambridge in Pol. An. in 2016.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Analysis
Edit article record marker