
🔎 The Problem With Current Matching Theory
Most existing inferential theories for matching assume simple random sampling and require exact matches. In practice, researchers often use stratified sampling designs and then perform ex post stratification—on a propensity score, a distance metric, or the covariates—to find approximate matches. That mismatch erodes the statistical properties the standard theories are meant to guarantee.
🧭 What This Paper Proposes
This work replaces simple random sampling with stratified sampling as the foundational axiom for a theory of inference for matching. Showing that sampling type is an axiom rather than a fragile assumption, the paper demonstrates that the theoretical implications remain coherent and valid under stratified designs.
📐 Core Mechanisms and Results
✅ Key Advantages for Researchers
🔬 Extensions and Practical Scope
⚠️ Why It Matters
This reconceptualization makes the properties of matching-based estimators more transparent and practically useful for researchers who design stratified studies, enabling reliable use of matching as preprocessing without sacrificing valid inference.

| A Theory of Statistical Inference for Matching Methods in Causal Research was authored by Stefano Iacus, Gary King and Giuseppe Porro. It was published by Cambridge in Pol. An. in 2019. |
