Constitutional length, age, and amendment frequency influence judicial invalidations. Longer documents create policy constraints; rarely updated texts fail to adapt to modern issues; recently adopted frameworks contain logroll weaknesses.

Key Findings

• Lengthy constitutions reduce government flexibility through increased detail
• Outdated texts lead to higher rates of constitutional challenges due to irrelevance
• Newer documents often feature problematic provisions from adoption processes

These findings demonstrate that formal constitution features can paradoxically increase substantive limitations on state power. The research adds nuance to ongoing debates about judicial review, highlighting how constitutional formality shapes government functionality.