
This article compares two prominent measures of electoral integrity—
The analysis reveals several key findings:
Despite assessing similar concepts, these two widely-used measures show remarkably low correlation across state elections.
Both indices appear to capture multiple aspects of electoral integrity rather than measuring a single dimension. Their component parts reflect different conceptualizations.
The study examines how the individual indicators comprising each measure relate to citizens' own perceptions about their state's electoral integrity.
Based on these findings, the authors provide guidance for future research:
The article concludes by urging caution in using standardized measures to assess complex political systems.

| Comparing Two Measures of Electoral Integrity in the American States was authored by Patrick Flavin and Gregory Shufeldt. It was published by Sage in SPPQ in 2019. |