FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Why Conspiracy Thinking Makes Europeans Overestimate Immigrant Numbers
Insights from the Field
Conspiracy mindset
Innumeracy
Immigrants
Europe
Online survey
Migration Citizenship
IPSR
1 R files
3 Datasets
Dataverse
Paranoid Styles and Innumeracy: Implications of a Conspiracy Mindset on Europeans' Misperceptions About Immigrants was authored by Sergio Martini, Mattia Guidi, Francesco Olmastroni, Linda Basile, Rossella Borri and Pierangelo Isernia. It was published by Cambridge in IPSR in 2022.

📊 Survey Across Ten European Countries

Innumeracy — difficulty working with numbers and giving accurate estimates about political facts — is widespread among the public. Using an online sample of respondents from 10 European countries, this study examines whether a conspiracy mindset predicts systematic misperceptions about the share of immigrants in respondents' own countries.

🧭 Main Findings

  • Respondents with a stronger propensity for a conspiracy worldview tend to substantially overestimate the actual share of the immigrant population in their country.
  • This relationship remains after accounting for country heterogeneity and a wide range of other factors, including cognitive ability, affective measures, and sociodemographic characteristics.

🔬 How the Relationship Was Tested

  • Comparative design spanning ten European countries, enabling checks for cross-national heterogeneity.
  • Refined measurements of conspiracy predisposition and of respondents' numeric estimates of immigrant shares.
  • Statistical controls included cognitive, affective, and sociodemographic variables to isolate the association between conspiracy mindset and innumeracy.

⚠️ Why It Matters

  • A conspiracy mentality appears to distort basic factual perceptions about politically relevant groups, not just isolated beliefs.
  • These misperceptions have implications for public opinion, policy preferences, and democratic accountability, since accurate factual beliefs are a foundation for holding representatives to account.

This work contributes to understanding how broader conspiratorial dispositions shape citizens' grasp of empirical realities in Western democracies.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Italian Political Science Review
Podcast host Ryan