FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Why Professional Legislatures Attract Better Candidates
Insights from the Field
professionalism
candidate quality
Chile
regression discontinuity
American Politics
SPPQ
Dataverse
The Source of the Legislative Professionalism Advantage: Attracting More Knowledgeable Candidates was authored by Zoe Nemerever and Daniel Butler. It was published by Sage in SPPQ in 2020.

This study addresses why professional legislative systems consistently draw candidates with higher levels of knowledge.

Introduction: The paper explores how political professionalism influences candidate quality. It challenges the notion that high entry barriers necessarily filter out less qualified contenders.

Data & Methods: Using regression discontinuity design and data from Chile's regional council elections, researchers analyze patterns across different electoral cycles (1989-2017). This method isolates the effect of legislative entry points by comparing candidates just above and below thresholds for professional status.

Key Findings: Professionalism creates an advantage not through exclusion but attraction. Councils with higher educational requirements attract more highly educated candidates, improving overall candidate quality despite stricter entry conditions.

Implications: This finding reframes political professionalism debates. Higher standards may enhance rather than merely restrict representation. It suggests professionalization can be a positive force for democratic development by elevating the caliber of elected officials.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Sage Journals
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
Podcast host Ryan
Dataverse may be empty.