Election timing fundamentally shapes political representation in American democracy. This study examines how the synchronization between electoral schedules and governing preferences varies across local school boards. Using data from California, we leverage district-level variation within states to analyze on-cycle versus off-cycle election impacts.

Data & Methods:

* Compares outcomes from districts holding elections during mid-terms (off-cycle) vs general election years (on-cycle)

* Analyzes alignment between school board members' political preferences and median constituent views

Key Findings:

* School boards elected in on-cycle years align significantly better with the median voter preference than those in off-cycle elections.

* This pattern emerges despite other factors typically considered influential on representation quality.

Why It Matters:

These findings demonstrate a previously unexamined disconnect between electoral timing and governance outcomes. The results suggest election scheduling matters for democratic responsiveness in ways not captured by traditional representation studies, offering new insights into institutional design effects.