🔎 What Was Studied
This study examines whether environmental scarcity—specifically drought severity—interacts with sociopolitical conditions to affect civil conflict onset across sub-Saharan Africa from 1962–2006. The analysis addresses a gap in cross-national evidence on conditional scarcity–conflict relationships.
đź“Š How the Analysis Was Conducted
A statistical analysis links measures of drought severity to civil conflict onset across countries in sub-Saharan Africa over the 1962–2006 period. The analysis explores how the drought–conflict relationship changes depending on three core sociopolitical conditions:
- social vulnerability
- state capacity
- unequal distribution of resources
Findings are tested for robustness across several alternative measures of these sociopolitical concepts.
đź“Ś Key Findings
- The three sociopolitical conditions (social vulnerability, state capacity, and unequal resource distribution) do influence the drought–conflict relationship.
- Contrary to common expectations, drought does not amplify the already high conflict risk in states that are vulnerable, weak, or unequal.
- Instead, severe drought undermines the peace-promoting features of more stable, less vulnerable states: during severe drought, such states are no less likely to experience conflict than states that ordinarily face higher violence risk.
- Results hold across multiple measures of the sociopolitical concepts examined.
- Overall interpretation: environmental scarcity is most likely to raise conflict risk where populations have more to lose compared with periods of better weather.
⚖️ Why It Matters
These results challenge the straightforward assumption that drought most threatens fragile, poorly governed, or unequal states. Policy and theory should account for the possibility that scarcity can destabilize otherwise stable societies—meaning vulnerability to climate shocks depends on what populations would lose under stress, not only on baseline fragility.
