🔎 Research Question

What types of candidates depended most on corporate donations in Brazil's 2010 elections for federal deputy? The study aims to identify candidate characteristics associated with higher levels of corporate funding.

📋 Hypotheses Tested

• 01. Right-wing party candidates are more dependent on corporate donations than left-wing candidates.
• 02. Government coalition candidates are more dependent than opposition candidates.
• 03. Incumbents are more dependent on corporate donations than challengers.
• 04. Businesspeople running as candidates receive more corporate donations than other candidates.
• 05. Male candidates are more dependent than female candidates.

📊 What Was Analyzed and How

• Data: Candidates in Brazil's 2010 elections for federal deputy.
• Research design: A combination of descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis.
• Models used: OLS regression, cluster analysis, and the Tobit model to account for donation distribution.

🔍 Key Findings

• Support found for hypotheses 01, 03, and 04: right-wing candidates, incumbents, and businesspeople received higher corporate donations.
• No empirical support for hypothesis 05: male candidates were not more dependent on corporate donations than female candidates.
• Hypothesis 02 was rejected; evidence indicates opposition candidates received more corporate contributions than government coalition candidates.

💡 Why It Matters

These results clarify which candidate profiles attract corporate funding in a major Latin American legislature and challenge assumptions about coalition advantage in corporate giving. The findings have implications for understanding electoral finance dynamics, representation, and the political influence of business interests in Brazil.