FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Voter Information Boosts Accountability in Senegal Elections, But Not Equally For All Types of Data

Field ExperimentSenegal electionsvoter accountabilityperformance feedbackAfrican Politics@AJPS2 R files9 Stata files19 DatasetsDataverse
African Politics subfield banner

New research examines how voters in Senegal respond to different types of information about incumbent politicians during the 2017 parliamentary elections. A field experiment investigated voter processing and accountability behaviors when given performance-related data versus other kinds of political information.

The findings reveal a significant difference based on information type: feedback regarding generally better-than-expected local service strongly affected voters' beliefs, leading to durable requests for greater post-election contact from incumbents. This influence was particularly notable among likely voters who prioritize tangible outcomes like local projects and infrastructure development when evaluating politicians. In contrast, providing information about general political duties did not systematically change accountability behaviors.

Article card for article: Able and Mostly Willing: an Empirical Anatomy of Information's Effect on Voter-Driven Accountability in Senegal
Able and Mostly Willing: an Empirical Anatomy of Information's Effect on Voter-Driven Accountability in Senegal was authored by Abhit Bhandari, Horacio Larreguy and John Marshall. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2023.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Edit article record marker