
This article synthesizes findings from 67 factorial survey experiments about gender influences in candidate choices. The meta-analysis reveals that while many studies exist, a clear consensus remains elusive.
What the Meta-Analysis Shows:
📊 Key Findings & Methodological Insights:
🔍 Why This Matters:
This comprehensive review highlights methodological inconsistencies across research and underscores the complexity of understanding gender dynamics in democratic processes. The field needs more rigorous experimental approaches to clarify these persistent ambiguities.

| What Have We Learned About Gender from Candidate Choice Experiments? A Meta-analysis of 67 Factorial Survey Experiments was authored by Susanne Schwarz and Alexander Coppock. It was published by Chicago in JOP in 2022. |