New Study on Local Governance in Italy
A groundbreaking survey examining Italian mayors' effectiveness reveals a sobering truth. Good politicians cannot fully compensate for weak institutions, challenging optimistic assumptions about leadership overcoming institutional deficiencies.
What the Research Shows
Drawing from an original dataset collected through comprehensive interviews with 300 mayors across Italy's regions, this research demonstrates that while capable leaders can implement effective policies in stronger local governments, they fail to overcome systemic weaknesses when institutions are fundamentally flawed. The findings suggest that institutional quality remains paramount regardless of individual leadership capabilities.
Research Approach & Data
This study utilizes an original survey methodology paired with comparative analysis across different Italian regions and time periods over the past decade. By triangulating qualitative insights from mayors against citizen satisfaction metrics, we achieve a nuanced understanding of governance effectiveness.
Key Findings
- Strong institutions correlate strongly with better governance outcomes regardless of mayor quality
- Individual political skill accounts for significantly less variance in policy effectiveness than institutional capacity - Even highly-rated mayors show diminished impact when facing institutional barriers
- Citizen perception data aligns closely with measurable governance outcomes
Implications
These findings offer crucial insights into Italy's local governance challenges, suggesting that reform efforts must prioritize institutional strengthening rather than simply searching for "good" leaders to implement policy.






