FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Broken Peace Pact in Colombia Shatters Trust Among Ex-Paramilitaries

Institutional TrustNormative CommitmentsColombiaInstrumentalist ReasonsLatin American PoliticsISQ1 Stata file2 DatasetsDataverse

### A New Understanding of Post-War Mistrust

Civil wars often leave deep scars, especially when governing requires trust among ex-combatants. This hurdle to peace has been understudied despite its critical role.

### The Colombian Case Study

We examine the 2008 decision by Colombia's government to extradite top paramilitary leaders—a move that created a natural experiment.

Our focus: how this deal reversal affected trust in government among ex-paramilitaries, versus ex-guerrillas not part of the same peace agreement.

### Our Findings

* Trust declined significantly among ex-paramilitaries after the extradition decision (estimates suggest roughly 50%).

* This erosion stemmed from normative reasons—believing their group had broken commitments—not instrumental ones like direct costs.

### Why It Matters for Peacebuilding

This suggests government actions undermining peace agreements may damage trust even among those not directly involved, highlighting the fragility of post-conflict social contracts. Breaking pacts appears to trigger widespread disillusionment.

Article Card
Destroying Trust in Government: Effects of a Broken Pact Among Colombian Ex-Combatants was authored by Joakim Kreutz and Enzo Nussio. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on OUP
International Studies Quarterly
data