FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Does Gender Bias Explain Publication Disparities? New Survey Challenges Existing Explanations

Teaching and Learning subfield banner

New research explores the gender gaps in perceptions of political science journals. While studies suggest a gender publication gap, this survey reveals that perceived biases vary across different journals. Both male and female scholars report differing views on where their work is likely to succeed.

Survey Results:

  • Women indicate they submit more often to certain journals than men do
  • Men feel greater likelihood of success with specific political science publications

No Evidence Found:

The findings contradict prior studies showing no bias in peer review processes

Instead, the data indicates submission pool distortions may be a key factor

Implications for Gender Equity:

These perception gaps help explain part of the ongoing gender disparities in publication outcomes.

They highlight how scholars' self-perceptions shape their career trajectories and contribute to disciplinary challenges.

Article card for article: Gender Gaps in Perceptions of Political Science Journals
Gender Gaps in Perceptions of Political Science Journals was authored by Nadia Brown, Yusaku Horiuchi, Mala Htun and David Samuels. It was published by Cambridge in PS in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
PS: Political Science & Politics
Edit article record marker