
New research explores the gender gaps in perceptions of political science journals. While studies suggest a gender publication gap, this survey reveals that perceived biases vary across different journals. Both male and female scholars report differing views on where their work is likely to succeed.
Survey Results:
No Evidence Found:
The findings contradict prior studies showing no bias in peer review processes
Instead, the data indicates submission pool distortions may be a key factor
Implications for Gender Equity:
These perception gaps help explain part of the ongoing gender disparities in publication outcomes.
They highlight how scholars' self-perceptions shape their career trajectories and contribute to disciplinary challenges.

| Gender Gaps in Perceptions of Political Science Journals was authored by Nadia Brown, Yusaku Horiuchi, Mala Htun and David Samuels. It was published by Cambridge in PS in 2020. |
