FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Income Inequality Shapes Borrowing Habits: New Evidence from OECD Countries

Income InequalityRedistribution PolicyCredit ExpansionLeft-Wing ParticipationComparative PoliticsWorld Pol.6 R files2 datasetsDataverse

New theory suggests that fiscal redistribution influences citizens' borrowing behavior.

Key Insight: When governments redistribute income, people borrow less to maintain consumption. Without such redistribution, Americans increasingly turn to debt during economic inequality expansion.

This groundbreaking research examines eighteen OECD democracies and finds a clear pattern: Countries with limited left-wing political participation show significantly greater credit expansion as pre-tax inequality rises.

Data & Methods: Using a comparative analysis of OECD countries over time. The authors track historical patterns of government ideology, income distribution, and consumer borrowing trends.

Findings:

• Fiscal redistribution dampens citizens' willingness to borrow

• Political polarization creates tension between redistributive policies and rising inequality

• Consumption smoothing mechanisms weaken when redistribution is limited

• Credit expansion appears tied directly to growing economic disparities in less redistributive nations

These findings suggest that addressing income inequality requires more than just policy recommendations—they necessitate fundamental changes in how citizens finance consumption during periods of economic divergence.

Article Card
Taking Credit: Redistribution and Borrowing in an Age of Economic Polarization was authored by John Ahlquist and Ben Ansell. It was published by Princeton in World Pol. in 2017.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Princeton
World Politics
data