FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Electoral Fraud Backfires in Russia: How Truth Erodes Support for Autocrats

Comparative Politics subfield banner

Does electoral fraud strengthen authoritarian regimes? New survey experiment data from post-2016 Russian elections suggest otherwise.

Context and Method: Conducted after the 2016 elections, this study measured voter reactions to fraudulent acts by regime candidates.

Our findings reveal that voters withdraw support when fraud is revealed - especially strong supporters of authoritarian rule. Core regime supporters often believe pre-elections are free and fair; exposure to fraud significantly reduces their propensity to back the system they depend on.

Key Results:

* Fraudulent acts by ruling party candidates reduce voter support across all segments

* Strongest effect seen among core regime supporters

* Belief in free elections before revelation is prevalent among loyalists

This evidence shows electoral fraud undermines autocratic power, not just sparks protest. Because even its most dedicated base expects honest elections.

Article card for article: Electoral Manipulation and Regime Support: Survey Evidence from Russia
Electoral Manipulation and Regime Support: Survey Evidence from Russia was authored by Ora John Reuter and David Szakonyi. It was published by Princeton in World Pol. in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Princeton
World Politics
Edit article record marker