FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Does Partisan Self-Interest Dictate Election Reform? Experimental Insights on Voting Cost Changes


partisan interest
election reform
voting behavior
field experiment
Voting and Elections
Pol. Behav.
1 other files
1 text files
Dataverse
Does Partisan Self-Interest Dictate Support for Election Reform? Experimental Evidence on the Willingness of Citizens to Alter the Costs of Voting for Electoral Gain was authored by Daniel Biggers. It was published by Springer in Pol. Behav. in 2019.

This study investigates citizens' support for election reform through experimental methods. Using a field experiment design with mock elections, researchers explored how partisan self-interest influences willingness to alter voting costs.

## Key Findings

* Voters consistently prioritize party advantage over equitable access to polling places.

* Reducing wait times disproportionately benefits one's own preferred party.

## Real-World Implications

This finding suggests that seemingly pro-democracy reforms may be driven by partisan self-interest rather than universal principles of voting equality. The results challenge conventional wisdom about voter preferences and highlight the need for careful evaluation of reform motivations.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Springer
Political Behavior
Podcast host Ryan