FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Dutch Politicians' Judgment: Cognitive Biases Despite Complex Governance?

Representativeness HeuristicDutch PoliticiansDecision-Making BiasSurvey ExperimentEuropean PoliticsPol. Behav.1 Stata file1 datasetDataverse
Subfield banner image

This study investigates the use of heuristics by local politicians in The Netherlands.

Data & Methods:

A survey experiment was conducted with 211 Dutch elected local politicians and 260 students to test for decision-making biases related to representativeness heuristic - specifically conjunction error (CE) and scope neglect (SN).

Key Findings: CE & SN Observed, Not Consistent Across Scenarios:

The results show that politician participants displayed CE in two out of three scenarios tested. They also showed evidence of SN in one scenario.

However, the third CE scenario did not find statistically significant evidence for politicians displaying this bias.

Why It Matters:

This suggests politicians utilize representativeness heuristics but their application may be inconsistent or dependent on specific contexts.

The findings offer empirical insights into cognitive processes underlying political judgment relevant to understanding democratic representation.

Article Card
Politicians, the Representativeness Heuristic and Decision-making Biases was authored by Sjoerd Stolwijk and Barbara Vis. It was published by Springer in Pol. Behav. in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Springer
Political Behavior
Edit article record marker