FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Why Do We Assume Policies Favor White Americans?

# Headline Strategy: Emphasize a surprising or counterintuitive finding

The article "Who Benefits? Race, Immigration, and Assumptions About Policy" investigates the persistent tendency for people to assume that immigration policies primarily benefit white individuals. Using survey experiments with samples from several countries including the United States, the researchers explore how racial assumptions influence policy perceptions.

Findings: Most Americans believe immigrants take jobs away from citizens - this misconception is widespread despite contradicting evidence.

* Data & Methods: Experimental design using representative surveys in multiple countries.

* Key Findings: White respondents consistently assume immigration policies favor their interests, regardless of content.

* Why It Matters: This research reveals unconscious biases shaping public opinion on immigration policy across racial groups.

The study demonstrates how implicit assumptions about race drive support for restrictive immigration policies among white Americans. By using a mixed-methods approach including statistical analysis and vignette experiments, the authors show these beliefs persist even when presented with evidence to the contrary. The findings challenge conventional wisdom about public opinion on immigration issues and highlight potential blind spots in policy discussions.

Article Card
Who Benefits? Race, Immigration, and Assumptions About Policy was authored by Jake Haselswerdt. It was published by Springer in Pol. Behav. in 2022.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Springer
Political Behavior
data