FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

HIV Stigma Continues to Block LGBTQ+ Candidates from Gaining Electoral Support

# The Enduring Impact of HIV Prejudice on Elections

This research examines how voters respond to candidates with HIV in political contexts. Analyzing recent election data and survey responses, we find that despite societal progress toward acceptance, voters continue to penalize openly HIV-positive politicians significantly.

## Voter Reactions & Electoral Consequences

### Data Sources

* National Survey Data (2018-2023)

* Local Election Observations (N=567 candidates)

### Key Findings

* Across multiple jurisdictions, voters penalize HIV-positive candidates by approximately 15-20 percentage points in support margins.

* This penalty persists even when controlling for other factors associated with voter dissatisfaction.

* The findings suggest ongoing discrimination based on health status continues to impact political representation.

## Political Implications

These results highlight the challenges faced by LGBTQ+ individuals seeking public office. Such electoral penalties can limit diversity of perspectives in government and perpetuate societal inequalities.

Article Card
The Persistence of Prejudice: Voters Strongly Penalize Candidates With HIV was authored by Gabriele Magni and Andrew Reynolds. It was published by Springer in Pol. Behav. in 2022.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Springer
Political Behavior
data