FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Unelected Legislators' Motivations Reveal Surprising Insights into Group Representation

non electoral motivationappointed legislatorsCanadian Senateracial identityComparative Politics@LSQ1 Stata fileDataverse
Comparative Politics subfield banner

Are politicians representing marginalized groups due to non-electoral motives? This study examines appointed Canadian senators, who lack electoral incentives. Using a novel survey on policy opinion priorities among various citizen groups, researchers found that senators with racial or regional minority identities influenced which group's views they prioritized learning about.

Data & Methods:

Survey administered to Canadian senators and their staff; captured how representatives prioritize learning about different citizens' opinions;

Key Findings:

Senators' personal group identities affected policy priorities; non-electoral motives may drive representation in some cases;

Implications:

This challenges existing assumptions about political representation; findings offer insights into unelected bodies and contexts with weak public oversight.

Article card for article: Nonelectoral Motivations to Represent Marginalized Groups in a Democracy: Evidence from an Unelected legislature
Nonelectoral Motivations to Represent Marginalized Groups in a Democracy: Evidence from an Unelected legislature was authored by John McAndrews, Jonah I. Goldberg, Peter John Loewen, Daniel Rubenson and Benjamin Allen Stevens. It was published by Wiley in LSQ in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Wiley
Legislative Studies Quarterly