FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Why More Seats Mean Less Pork: A New Clarity Model Explains District Representation Priorities

Pork ProvisionDistrict RepresentationMagnitude EffectsElite SurveysLatin AmericaComparative PoliticsLSQ2 Stata files3 datasetsDataverse
Comparative Politics subfield banner

The personal vote seeking model has long dominated electoral rules research, but new findings suggest its applicability depends on the type of district representation.

A simpler "clarity" model offers a better explanation for pork allocation priorities in democracies. This theory proposes that high district magnitude reduces clarity about who deserves credit for pork outcomes because responsibility becomes dispersed across more legislators.

Our analysis uses elite survey data from 14 Latin American countries and 10 Western European democracies to demonstrate empirical support for the clarity model's predictions regarding pork provision priorities.

Article card for article: A Clarity Model of District Representation: District Magnitude and Pork Priorities
A Clarity Model of District Representation: District Magnitude and Pork Priorities was authored by Mathias Tromborg and Leslie Schwindt-Bayer. It was published by Wiley in LSQ in 2022.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Edit article record marker