NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Saudi Crackdowns on Online Dissent: What Really Happens When Activists Are Imprisoned?

This study investigates the impact of imprisoning Saudi activists for online dissent. Analyzing over 300 million tweets and Google search data from 2010-2017, we find two key effects.

First, repression appears to deter individual imprisoned Saudis significantly. Those behind bars are notably less active in posting critical content on social media.

Second, overall online dissent does not decrease substantially despite these arrests. In fact, Twitter followers of the targeted individuals often show increased engagement with dissenting themes, including criticism of the ruling family and calls for regime change.

Interestingly, repression itself becomes a catalyst: it draws public attention to the causes being protested and appears to galvanize rather than discourage political expression more broadly.

These findings highlight an important tension in digital authoritarianism strategies. While imprisonments successfully reduce individual dissenters' online activities, they fail to suppress discourse among followers who continue engaging with controversial topics.

American Political Science Review
How Saudi Crackdowns Fail to Silence Online Dissent was authored by Jennifer Pan and Alexandra Siegel. It was published in APSR in 2020. Find on Google Scholar10.1017/S0003055419000650
Comparative Politics subfield banner