FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
TRC Numbers Misleading: Capture-Recapture Methods Flipped Expected Results
Insights from the Field
Capture-Recapture
Peru TRC
Indirect Estimation
Latin American Politics
R&P
13 Stata files
12 Datasets
1 PDF
10 Text
Dataverse
Capturing Correctly: A Reanalysis of the Indirect Capture-recapture Methods in the Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission was authored by Silvio Rendon. It was published by Sage in R&P in 2019.

The Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission's (TRC) use of capture–recapture methods for documenting mass violence has typically been lauded. With 25,000 records, the TRC estimated roughly 69,000 killings, concluding that Shining Path was the primary perpetrator — contrary to what raw data suggested about state involvement.

🔍 Data & Methods

Examined documented deaths via capture-recapture analysis. But note: the TRC employed an indirect approach combining various perpetrator types and pooling missing information.

📊 Estimation Results

Standard direct methods show starkly different outcomes:

* ~48,000 total killings

* Peruvian State responsible for a much larger portion

🚨 Contradiction

This challenges the accepted view that capture-recapture corrects observed data biases.

The TRC's indirect technique actually skewed results by combining perpetrator groups.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Sage Journals
Rsearch & Politics
Podcast host Ryan