FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Conspiracies Backfire Differently for Dems vs Reps

Political Behavior subfield banner

### Exploring Election Beliefs Before 2016 Polls

New survey experiments conducted just before and after the US election revealed partisan differences in how conspiracy theories affect views. The study tested whether reading conspiratorial accounts about election interference would harm trust in democratic institutions.

### Negative Emotions as Mediators

Researchers found that exposure to claims of election tampering increased negative feelings like anxiety or anger, which then reduced confidence in democracy's core principles among participants.

### Partisan Moderation Effects

Contrary predictions were observed: Democrats exposed to Russian interference narratives showed diminished trust, while Republicans reading about Democratic Party involvement actually expressed stronger support for democratic norms. The findings highlight that conspiracy claims erode institutional confidence differently based on partisan beliefs.

Article card for article: Conspiracy Theories, Election Rigging, and Support for Democratic Norms
Conspiracy Theories, Election Rigging, and Support for Democratic Norms was authored by Bethany Albertson and Kim Guiler. It was published by Sage in R&P in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Sage Journals
Research & Politics