FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Custodial Citizens Paradox: How CSO Ties Boost Non-Voting Political Engagement Despite Incarceration's Toll

Custodial CitizensCivil Society OrganizationsChicagoRegression AnalysisPolitical BehaviorPOP4 R files2 Stata files2 datasetsDataverse
Subfield banner image

New research explores how personal connections to civil society organizations (CSOs) can buffer the negative effects of incarceration on political participation beyond traditional voting. Using data from Chicago, this study reveals a counterintuitive finding: while involuntary criminal justice contact generally reduces all forms of political engagement, prior involvement with CSOs strengthens nonvoting political activities among those who've been incarcerated—even in states that restore the franchise immediately after release. The findings challenge simplistic assumptions about civic disengagement post-incarceration and suggest complex pathways to sustained political influence outside electoral processes.

📍 Key Context

  • Met with rising incarceration rates nationwide, this research examines how contact with justice system affects broader associational life and participation patterns.
Article Card
The Civic Voluntarism of "Custodial Citizens": Involuntary Criminal Justice Contact, Associational Life, and Political Participation was authored by Hannah Walker and Michael Leo Owens. It was published by Cambridge in POP in 2018.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Perspectives on Politics
Edit article record marker