This article introduces "agenda seeding" as a strategy minority groups use to gain influence despite political asymmetries. The concept explains how marginalized activists can capture attention from elites and the public.

The research examines black-led protests during 1960-1972, analyzing both nonviolent tactics (sit-ins, marches) and violent confrontations in relation to media coverage and political discourse. It challenges elite theories of influence by demonstrating that activists exert power through disruption.

Data & Methods

Evaluating news reports and speeches during this period reveals:

* Nonviolent Tactics Like Sit-ins: These effectively drove media attention, shaped framing, influenced congressional speech, and swayed public opinion on civil rights issues. Counties near these protests saw a 1.6-2.5% increase in presidential Democratic votes.

* Protester-Initiated Violence: This type of violence also captured agendas but redirected the focus toward "social control" narratives within elite discourse and among concerned citizens.

A New Explanation for Influence

Using rainfall as an instrumental variable via regression discontinuity design, this study quantifies that violent protests in 1968 likely shifted white voters' preferences toward Republicans by 1.5-7.9%. These findings suggest activists can indeed move agendas and discourse through strategic disruption.

Elites may dominate political communication but do not hold a monopoly on agenda setting or public influence.