FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Political Science Journals Strive for Replicability, But Many Appendices Still Fall Short


replicability
data access
online appendices
transparency
Teaching and Learning
POP
2 PDF files
1 datasets
Dataverse
Can We Do Better? Replication and Online Appendices in Political Science was authored by Jonathan Grossman and Ami Pedahzur. It was published by Cambridge in POP in 2021.

Leading political science journals now emphasize data access and research transparency through online appendices. These digital resources often contain essential replication materials including datasets and code.

However, The Challenge of Effective Replication

Many current appendices remain inaccessible or compartmentalized. They are frequently difficult to understand due to unclear formatting or lack of integration with the main text.

Why This Matters for Political Science Research

This gap between intention and practice undermines genuine replicability – a cornerstone principle within political science methodology.

Authors' Proposed Solutions

Researchers suggest several improvements:

  • Making appendices more intuitive by improving user-friendliness
  • Integrating supplementary content seamlessly with the main article text
  • Standardizing appendix formats across journals to enhance clarity and accessibility

Furthermore, The Online Platform Choice Matters

Selecting appropriate digital platforms for hosting these essential resources is crucial.

This article demonstrates these issues clearly while proposing concrete ways authors can create more effective appendices.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Perspectives on Politics
Podcast host Ryan