FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Why Democracies Win (Even Though They Don't Fight)

democracy pacifismimperialist biasstate rent seekingdemocratic victoryInternational Relations@APSR1 datasetDataverse
International Relations subfield banner

Powerful democracies are surprisingly war-prone when confronting autocratic states. This article explains how democratic political systems, despite their peaceful tendencies with other democracies, often emerge victorious in conflicts against authoritarian regimes.

The explanation draws from microeconomic theory of the state. State rent-seeking—the pursuit of power for its own sake—creates imperialist bias toward expansionism. This tendency is weakest in democracies because societal control keeps such gains costly and inefficient.

In contrast to autocracies, where rent-seeking drives aggressive foreign policies, democracies demonstrate constrained resource commitment due to their political structure. They also tend to receive stronger public support for security measures.

Ironically, this makes democratic states formidable opponents against expansionist autocracies.

Article card for article: Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War
Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War was authored by David A. Lake. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 1992.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
American Political Science Review